Engadget: Software firm finds Windows 7 doesn't boot faster than Vista

Posted by on under iolo technologies, tune up software, boot times, sleep mode, promes, vta, old windows, software firm, term tests, boot time, different story, mth, software software, real world, nbsp, improvements, sleep |


There's no question that Windows 7 promises plenty of improvements over Vista, with one of the biggest being faster boot times. While that's certainly been the experience for some, Iolo Technologies (a maker of PC tune-up software) found some significantly different results in their long term tests, which they say show that Windows 7 isn't faster than Vista at all in real world use. Specifically, they found that while Windows 7 actually got to the desktop fairly quickly, it took a full minute and 34 seconds to actually become usable, compared to a minute and 6 seconds with Vista. They also unsurprisingly found that things got worse over time, with a three-month old Windows 7 install adding a full minute to the boot time, although in that case it did actually fare somewhat better than Vista. Of course, we are talking about complete reboots here, and it's a different story when Windows 7 is simply coming in and out of sleep mode. Details on the tests are otherwise a bit light, but Iolo is promising to release its complete findings next week.

Filed under: Software

Software firm finds Windows 7 doesn't boot faster than Vista originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:11:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments



Tagi: iolo technologies, tune up software, boot times, sleep mode, promes, vta, old windows, software firm, term tests, boot time, different story, mth, software software, real world, nbsp, improvements, sleep